0 members (),
400
guests, and
23
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
#59930
Tue 31 May 2011 03:00:PM
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 381,903
Launch Director
|
OP
Launch Director
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 381,903 |
False positives and exaggerated results in peer-reviewed scientific studies have reached epidemic proportions in recent years. The problem is rampant in economics, the social sciences and even the natural sciences, but it is particularly egregious in biomedicine. Many studies that claim some drug or treatment is beneficial have turned out not to be true. We need only look to conflicting findings about beta-carotene, vitamin E, hormone treatments, Vioxx and Avandia. Even when effects are genuine, their true magnitude is often smaller than originally claimed. The problem begins with the public’s rising expectations of science. Being human, scientists are tempted to show that they know more than they do. The number of investigators--and the number of experiments, observations and analyses they produce--has also increased exponentially in many fields, but adequate safeguards against bias are lacking. Research is fragmented, competition is fierce and emphasis is often given to single studies instead of the big picture. [More] Source: An Epidemic of False Claims
David Cottle
UBB Owner & Administrator
|
|
CMS The Best Conveyancing solicitors conveyancing quotes throughout the UK
For any webhosting enquiries please email webmaster@aus-city.com
|
Forums60
Topics686,123
Posts720,734
Members2,957
|
Most Online3,142 Jan 16th, 2023
|
|
|